Cisco Tech Blog CiscoTech Blog Close
Home Contact

Kubernetes “kubectl cp” Command to Jeopardize Cloud-Based Host Instances

Author

Kubernetes “kubectl cp” Command to Jeopardize Cloud-Based Host Instances 🔗︎

A security issue was recently discovered with the Kubernetes kubectl cp command that could potentially enable a directory traversal to replace or delete files on a user’s workstation or cloud instance. This is a high severity issue, and it is recommended to upgrade kubectl to Kubernetes 1.11.9, 1.12.7, 1.13.5, or 1.14.0. See CVE-2019-1002101 and the fix.

The latest security issue was initially found earlier this month by Ariel Zelivansky, a security researcher at Twistlock.

Vulnerability Details 🔗︎

The kubectl cp command is used to copy files between containers and the user machine or cloud instance. To copy files from a container, Kubernetes first creates a tar file inside the container, copies it over the network, and then kubectl unpacks it on the user’s machine or cloud instance.

If the tar binary in the container is malicious, it could run any code and output unexpected, malicious results. An attacker could use this to write files to any path on the user’s machine when kubectl cp is called, limited only by the system permissions of the local user. Since an earlier vulnerability, CVE-2018-1002100 was fixed, the untar function calls cp.go:clean to strip path traversals. However, this function can both create and follow symbolic links.

Consider the following scenario in which the user uses kubectl cp to copy a malicious tar file hosted within a container. This file contains both a malicious piece of code and a symbolic link to that of a target directory e.g. /proc/john/cron → /evildir/evil. In this situation, once the user runs the cron job, it will run the malicious code of the attacker, and even with non-root permissions, this would be extremely dangerous.

Impact 🔗︎

This vulnerability can be harmful in one of two scenarios:

  • If a user downloads a malicious container image with a bad tar, or even uses a bad open source.
  • An attacker gets access to a running container using another exploit, or through legitimate access e.g. a misconfiguration of an SG, or access list network credentials.

The Cisco Cloud Native Security solution 🔗︎

By following two simple steps, opening a Cisco Cloud Native Security account, and installing Cisco on your cluster, using a single yaml file, the Cisco Cloud Native Security platform will provide runtime cryptographic identity validation for any file or workload on the host. A workload executed without a properly validated identity will be detected immediately and, optionally, killed. Moreover, any attempted communication from this workload to a valid service on the host will be detected, intercepted, and dropped. In the example below, we detected an unidentified workload copied from Customer/Cluster-A while trying to masquerade itself as an OS process ‘agetty’. It also identified an unidentified process attempting to communicate to a Postgres database and blocked it.

network visibility network visibility

Conclusion 🔗︎

Although this vulnerability could potentially be solved by hardening the container environment, e.g. blocking remote execution of host remote exec (&exec.DefaultRemoteExecutor), or removing kubectl cp or tar from the container, this would be crippling for the DevOps operation. The correct approach is to cryptographically protect the runtime environment.

This vulnerability only affects the user client for Kubernetes, kubectl (and the OpenShift equivalent, oc). All kubectl versions from v1.9.0-alpha.2 to 1.14.0 are vulnerable. Versions 1.11.9, 1.12.7, 1.13.5 have the fix.